On July 1, 2026, the FTC sought public comment on a proposed policy statement warning that companies which distort their AI systems' outputs to serve undisclosed goals may be deceiving consumers under the FTC Act. Comments were due July 31, 2026 (docket FTC-2026-0859), and the statement flags potential conflicts with state AI laws.
FTC proposes policy targeting AI systems steered away from accuracy
If you deploy AI that gives users answers or recommendations, document how your system is tuned and avoid hidden steering; misrepresenting objectivity or accuracy is now framed as a deception risk the FTC may pursue.
Source: Federal Trade Commission
More that helps you.
Colorado delays its AI Act to Jan 1, 2027 and scales back its requirements
Gov. Polis signed SB 189 on May 14, 2026, pushing the Colorado AI Act's effective date from June 30, 2026 to January 1, 2027 and significantly narrowing its duties on developers an…
Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA) in effect Jan 1, 2026
TRAIGA (HB 149), effective January 1, 2026, amends the Texas Data Privacy and Security Act with AI-specific duties and prohibits AI systems used for behavioral manipulation, unlawf…
EU AI Act transparency rules now enforceable, fines up to 3% of global turnover
From 2 August 2026 the EU Commission's AI Office and national authorities began enforcing the AI Act's transparency duties: chatbots must disclose they are AI, deepfakes and AI-gen…
AI transparency rules now enforced in Sweden: label chatbots and AI content
From 2 August 2026 the EU AI Act's transparency obligations (Article 50) are enforced and apply directly in Sweden: businesses must tell users when they are interacting with a chat…
Get briefs like this tuned to you.
In the app, Founder Briefs are personalized to your country, industry and stage, and you can save the ones that matter.
See plans →